How is the U.S. and Israeli War With Iran Bringing Us Closer to a Worldwide Famine? An Interview with Michael Yon

Posted on by

It’s All About Routes, Resources and “Choke” Points, Energy Access, Fertilizer, Water, Forced International Migration, “Cults” and “Religion”, Compromised Geopolitical Leaders…Community, Self-Suffciency and Thoughtful Preparation…Michael Yon, LLC
PO Box 66, Archer, FL 32618
MichaelYon.Substack.com
Michaelyon.com
About – Mission – Support
michael.yon@gmail.com
Michael.Yon@protonmail.com

Summary Overview “How is the U.S. and Israeli War with Iran Increasing the Risk to World-Wide Famine” Kirk Hamilton Interview Michael Yon March 6, 2026.

(Summary and Outline of Interview Transcript generated by ChatGPT and Edited By Kirk Hamilton PA)

Detailed Interview Summary…

Kirk Hamilton opens the interview by explaining why he sometimes brings geopolitics into a health-focused program: in his view, personal health cannot be separated from larger issues such as war, social instability, and access to basic necessities. He introduces Michael Yon as a former Green Beret, Special Forces and Combat War Correspondent who studies global conflict through the lens of “routes, resources, and ideology.” From the outset, the interview is framed around the idea that a widening U.S.-Israeli war with Iran could trigger a global famine (Yon notes geopolitical factors are already years in development) by disrupting critical chokepoints, especially the Strait of Hormuz. Yon argues that the Middle East conflict is not just regional, but central to the global food and energy system, because enormous volumes of oil, gas, and fertilizer move through that corridor. He says that if the Strait of Hormuz is shut down for any sustained period, countries heavily dependent on imported energy and agricultural inputs—especially Japan and Europe—would be severely destabilized, with cascading effects on transportation, fertilizer production, and food supply chains worldwide.

Share

Consequences of Modern Famine…

A major theme of Yon’s argument is that modern famine would not begin simply as a shortage of food on grocery shelves, but as a systems failure involving energy, water, transport, and farm inputs. He stresses that much of the Middle East depends on desalination plants for water, and those plants depend on energy. In his view, it would not even be necessary to destroy the desalination plants directly (i.e. by bombing); cutting energy supplies alone could render them useless. He says this would force millions of people in the Gulf region to flee because they would lose both potable water and imported food access. He predicts that displaced populations would move into places such as Germany (i.e. Europe), Texas (i.e. U.S.), and elsewhere, while the collapse of Gulf exports would disrupt the fertilizer and fuel markets, worsening food insecurity far beyond the region itself. He repeatedly emphasizes that what is unfolding is not a temporary disruption but a strategic and long-term dismantling of infrastructure that supports everyday life.

Hamilton asks whether Iran itself would be responsible for closing the Strait of Hormuz or whether the United States and Israel would do so. Yon said it could be both questions the common assumption that Iran would deliberately shut the Strait of Hormuz, arguing that doing so would harm Iran as well. Instead, he suggests that such an event would more likely be carried out by outside actors and blamed on Iran. From there, the conversation broadens into a sweeping theory of deliberate destabilization in which pipeline sabotage (i.e. ex. Nordstream 2), the closure of European energy sources, animal disease outbreaks, food processing disruptions, seed patents, and prior public-health policies are all described as interconnected parts of a larger plan to reduce population and consolidate control. Yon claims that multiple strategic chokepoints—not only Hormuz but also the Panama Canal, the Strait of Malacca, the Turkish Straits, Gibraltar, the Danish Straits, and major European ports such as Hamburg, Rotterdam, and Antwerp—could be targeted to create worldwide famine conditions. He presents this not as random conflict but as a methodical process years in the making.

Global Elite, Zionism vs. Israeli vs. Judaism vs. Jewish People…

The interview then moves away from famine mechanics and into Yon’s ideological interpretation of who is behind these events. He distinguishes sharply between Israelis, Jews, Judaism, and Zionists, arguing that they are often conflated in public discourse but are not the same thing. He characterizes Zionism not as a religious identity but as a political and strategic movement centered on control of key territory and chokepoints, especially around the Suez Canal and broader regional trade routes. He spends considerable time discussing the historical formation of modern Israel, British imperial interests, Theodore Herzl, and the Netanyahu family, presenting these as part of a long historical continuum in which geopolitical control, rather than religion alone, is primary. Yon repeatedly describes what he calls the “core Zionists” as a cult-like power structure motivated by domination, war, and even apocalyptic thinking. He argues that Israel, in this framework, functions both as an asset and a liability for that structure—valuable because of its location and military role, but expendable in the pursuit of larger ideological goals.

Driven by Ideology vs. Self-Preservation…

Hamilton presses Yon to clarify how such actors could be willing to risk not only regional devastation but potentially their own destruction. Yon answers by saying they are driven by ideology more than normal self-preservation. He returns again and again to the language of cults, saying that ordinary people make the mistake of assuming elites think rationally or morally in the same way they do. Yon says he spent years studying cults, especially a Hindu sect called Aghori, and he uses that experience as a framework for understanding what he sees as an extreme ruling core with no ethical limits. He compares the behavior of these supposed elites to the psychology of destructive cults, arguing that they seek power through transgression, coercion, blackmail, and ritualized corruption. This becomes the interpretive lens through which he explains war policy, blackmail networks, state capture, and the apparent willingness to consider nuclear escalation. He argues that ordinary concepts like national interest, self-defense, or institutional loyalty are inadequate to explain the behavior of actors he views as operating from this cultic mentality.

Is The U.S. Government Compromised? A Global Epstein’s Island?…

Hamilton then asks whether U.S. leadership is participating knowingly or is instead compromised. Yon answers that recruitment into elite power systems generally comes through four motives: money, ideology, coercion, and ego. He says blackmail operations such as Epstein’s are only one part of a much broader system of control, and that in the age of digital surveillance nearly everyone in power is vulnerable because their phones, travel, private conduct, and communications create permanent records. He describes this as a kind of “global Epstein Island,” meaning a world in which compromising data can be collected and weaponized at scale. In his view, this helps explain why so many political, military, and corporate leaders comply with agendas that appear destructive to their own countries. He also argues that multiple intelligence services and competing power centers participate in this environment, making it a “multiplayer game” rather than a single conspiracy with only one actor.

World War? Nuclear Escalation?…

As the discussion turns back to the risk of war, Yon says he believes the chances of nuclear escalation are greater than fifty percent and could materialize very soon rather than years down the line. He says the conflict is no longer speculative and could spiral into attacks in Israel, Europe, or the United States that would then be used as justification for wider retaliation. He warns that if major powers such as Russia and China are targeted directly, the world as it is currently known could effectively end. Even while discussing famine, he repeatedly returns to the possibility that food collapse and mass starvation would occur alongside war, refugee movements, and even nuclear exchange. This is why he describes the present moment as larger than the pandemic era and as another decisive historical inflection point.

What Can Countries and Individuals Can Do To Prepare For a Famine? (…Japan, Thailand, Ireland, Europe…Secure energy and fertilizer?)…

Hamilton then asks what ordinary people should do, and Yon answers partly from the perspective of Japan, where he is living. He says Japan is especially vulnerable because it depends heavily on imported energy passing through the Strait of Hormuz and on imported food or fertilizer-dependent trading partners. He argues that Japan should have secured more energy from Russia years earlier, and he warns that if Gulf energy flows are interrupted, Japan could face severe food shortages. He points to Thailand as a critical rice supplier but says Thailand itself depends on imported nitrogen fertilizer, much of it linked to Gulf energy markets. He extends this logic to Ireland and Europe, arguing that even countries that export large amounts of food still rely on external energy and fertilizer inputs, so their production would decline sharply in a true systemic crisis. His central point is that famine is no longer a local or regional phenomenon that can be offset by surpluses elsewhere; it would be global and structural, with too many countries competing for too little food at the same time.

If Michael Yon “Were President” of the United States What Steps Would He Immediately Take?…

In one of the interview’s more practical sections, Hamilton asks Yon “What would you do if you were president of the United States?” Yon proposed these immediate actions:
1) Firing or reducing the number significantly flag officers (admirals and generals),
2) Shutting down military academies temporarily to break what he sees as a corrupted officer pipelines,
3) Severing support for Israel,
4) Refusing U.S. backing if Israel used nuclear weapons,
5) Eliminating dual-loyalty structures (i.e. dual citizenship),
6) Leaving the United Nations,
7) Cutting certain foreign aid (USAID, NGOs, etc.)
8) Massively shrinking the federal government,
9) Abolishing the Department of Education,
10) Encouraging liberty gardens and local food production,
11) Ending restrictions that burden small farmers,
12) Abolishing the Federal Reserve,
13) Promoting savings in precious metals rather than fiat currency.
14) Immediate mass deportations of all illegal aliens
15) Harsh penalties on employers who hire undocumented workers, and the dismantling of what he describes as migration pipelines involving NGOs and international organizations.
16) Reduce or eliminate forms of chemical spraying on foods/agriculture, weather modification, and other perceived domestic harms with appropriate prosecution of perpetrators.
…Hamilton responds by saying this sounds like the “Real ‘America First’ Agenda” that many voters expected but believe they have not received.

Family and Community Action and Preparation…Real Self-Care and Community…

Despite outlining sweeping political reforms, Yon repeatedly insists that large-scale preparation must happen at the family and community level because national institutions are too compromised to be relied upon. He says storing food is helpful but only smooths out “speed bumps” and is not enough if the entire food-production system is breaking down. He advises people to think strategically, assess their own skills and liabilities, form resilient local groups, learn practical self-sufficiency, and return to more basic ways of living. He emphasizes that each person’s situation is different and that there is no universal script. He warns urban residents with few resources to think carefully about their vulnerability, while praising long-time preppers and those who have already learned gardening, animal husbandry, and local resilience. He says knowledge, moral clarity, teamwork, and the ability to organize with others will matter more than money if society and conditions deteriorate badly. His closing message is that people should stop expecting a return to pre-2020 normality, recognize that another larger inflection point is underway, and begin preparing deliberately rather than rashly.

International Migration at Our Southern Border…

The interview closes on a more personal and logistical note. Hamilton asks Yon about Panama, the Darien Gap, and the movement of migrants—especially military-age Chinese men—toward the United States. Yon says these migration flows are being facilitated by transnational networks, NGOs, and diaspora support systems, and he characterizes them as part of a broader invasion and destabilization effort.

In Closing Beyond Famine…

Overall, the conversation moves far beyond the original topic of famine and becomes a broad warning about global war, ideological extremism, state capture, migration, institutional corruption, and civilizational breakdown. The famine argument remains the central spine of the episode, but Yon’s larger point is that food insecurity is only one visible symptom of what he believes is a much wider geopolitical and spiritual conflict already in motion.

1. Paragraph Summary and Outline of Interview with Michael Yon by Kirk Hamilton PA, March 6, 2026
(Generated by ChatGP then edited by Kirk Hamilton PA)

In this interview on the Staying Healthy Today Show, host Kirk Hamilton speaks with former Green Beret, Special Forces and war correspondent Michael Yon about how escalating conflict involving the United States, Israel, and Iran could increase the risk of global famine. Yon argues that modern food security depends on fragile global systems involving energy, fertilizer production, transportation routes, and water infrastructure. He emphasizes that critical maritime chokepoints—especially the Strait of Hormuz—are central to global oil and fertilizer flows, and that prolonged disruption of these routes could cascade into worldwide food shortages. According to Yon, many regions rely heavily on imported energy and agricultural inputs, meaning interruptions to shipping, fertilizer supply, and fuel could significantly reduce food production and distribution. The discussion broadens into Yon’s broader geopolitical perspective that conflicts over “routes, resources, and ideology” are driving global instability, with major powers competing over strategic locations and supply chains. He warns that systemic disruptions to fertilizer production, energy transport, and global trade could create widespread competition for food supplies and trigger large-scale migration and economic strain. Yon concludes by suggesting that individuals and communities should consider resilience strategies—such as local food production, cooperation, and preparedness—because global supply systems will face increasing pressure in the coming years.

2. Outline of the Interview

Introduction

  • Host Kirk Hamilton introduces the show’s focus on health and global issues affecting societal stability.
  • Guest Michael Yon is introduced as a former Green Beret, Special Forces and war correspondent who studies geopolitics.

Central Question

  • How could the conflict involving the United States, Israel, and Iran contribute to a global famine risk?

Global Food System Vulnerabilities

Yon argues that food security depends on interconnected systems:

  • Energy production and transport
  • Fertilizer manufacturing
  • Global shipping routes
  • Agricultural inputs and trade networks

Disruption in any of these areas can affect global food availability.

Strategic Chokepoints

Yon highlights several maritime and trade chokepoints that influence global supply chains:

  • Strait of Hormuz
  • Panama Canal
  • Strait of Malacca
  • Turkish Straits
  • Gibraltar
  • Danish Straits

These routes carry energy, fertilizer, and agricultural products essential to global food production.

Fertilizer and Agricultural Inputs

  • Modern agriculture depends heavily on nitrogen fertilizers, often produced using natural gas.
  • Many countries import fertilizer components from energy-producing regions.
  • Disruptions in energy markets can reduce fertilizer availability and crop yields.

Regional Vulnerabilities

Examples discussed in the interview:

  • Japan relies heavily on imported energy and food.
  • Thailand exports rice but depends on imported fertilizers.
  • Europe relies on energy infrastructure and fertilizer imports for agriculture.

Potential Consequences

According to Yon:

  • Reduced fertilizer production could decrease crop yields worldwide.
  • Competition for limited food supplies could intensify.
  • Migration and geopolitical tensions could increase.

Policy and Preparedness Discussion

Hamilton asks Yon what actions he would take if leading the United States.

Topics discussed include:

  • Military and foreign policy restructuring
  • Government reform proposals
  • Energy security
  • Agricultural independence
  • Immigration enforcement

Broader Geopolitical Perspective

Yon frames global conflict through the lens of:

  • Control of routes
  • Access to resources
  • Competing ideologies

He argues that these factors shape international conflicts and economic strategies.

Individual and Community Preparedness

Yon suggests individuals focus on:

  • Community resilience
  • Local food production
  • Practical skills
  • Cooperative networks

He believes resilience at the local level may become increasingly important if global systems experience major disruptions which he expects.

Staying Healthy Today is a reader-supported publication.
To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

(Consider becoming a paid subscriber $5.00/month)

Dr. Joe Dispenza’s Website

Falun Dafa – Truthfulness, Compassion and Forbearance
Brief Introduction to Falun Dafa
Books & Recent Writings of Mr. Li Hongzhi
Video & Audio Materials
Take an Online Class

Kirk Hamilton PA-C
Health Associates Medical Group
3301 Alta Arden, Suite 3
Sacramento, CA 95825
(916) 489-4400 (w)
krhammer@surewest.net
www.StayingHealthyToday.Substack.com
www.StayingHealthyToday.com
www.HealthyLivingforBusypeople.com
www.KwikerMedical.com